Is the MHRA having a laugh?
Yet more absurd, manipulative and dishonest manoeuvres from an institution that needs to be completely gutted and replaced.
Please take the time to review this important UKC segment on the MHRA and its refusal to release COVID Vaccine damage data despite repeated FOI requests.
We have now entered the realms of the absurd: The UK’s main medicines regulator is telling us, with a straight face, that raw data relating to COVID Vaccine damage needs to be peer reviewed before being released to the public.
Anyone who knows anything about the scientific process will understand this is totally, completely and utterly nonsensical and amounts to an institutional attempt to defraud the British people.
To be clear: you don’t peer review raw data, you peer review the analysis of it.
Any suggestion to the contrary is simply gaslighting.
We now have over 3 million people on long-term disability benefits. Lives have been ravaged by the actions of the British state and its conspirators in corporations and regulatory bodies like the MHRA.
This has to end.
Thank you to Cheryl Grainger and Norman Fenton for your staunch and ongoing work on this crucial topic.
We will continue to apply the pressure required to secure transparency and accountability, but we need you (yes, you) and the wider public actively engaged in this process.
Please watch and share widely.
From London.
Ben Rubin
Join us on Telegram
Join me on Twitter
Join me on Instagram
Regulatory capture is a well recognized risk. We’re way beyond “capture”, where officials think like those they’re tasked with regulating. In this case, MHRA is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of pharma. When MHRA speaks, you’re hearing them reading a script written for them by pharma.
The MHRA are indeed appalling. Please do check out my substack as it ties in with your work. On there:
1. Evidence of an unexplained extra 50,000 reference codes inputted which may pertain to the pregnancy study adverse events. (My first post, graph spike in March 22 - can send more detail if required)
2. Evidence of 160,000+ missing Yellow Cards (over 250,000 now). Detailed on my first substack post.
3. Discovered 6 months worth of transaction data missing, specifically from September 2019 to March 2020 (most recent post). Oh my goodness, were they in talks for a vaccine that early?
4. Their admission on their position that the high awareness of the YC scheme and reporting of suspected reactions was merely inferred through the sheer number of Yellow Cards. I then called for their arrest.
5. A deconstruction of their various positions through their very own FOI answers revealing absurdities running wild.
6. And how I went in for an MHRA takedown!