16 Comments
User's avatar
Flowie Georgiou's avatar

i remember Matt Hancock announcing we were going to do this within 8 years at the 2019 WEF davos event.

spine chilling but gullible parents will fall for it…..

Expand full comment
Ben Rubin's avatar

People trust the NHS, it’s a cult

Expand full comment
Philippa Rees's avatar

So! They have never isolated the Cov19 virus BUT they have sequenced a software genome model from it? That software was behind the 'we-got-it-right vaccine? The vast array of serious, sometimes lethal, side effects of the vaccines could have been, and were, predicted?(Otherwise, this monitoring baby DNA to 'prevent' disease programme is baloney). I have a hypothesis. I suspect that the mRNA vaccine was programmed to detect and target any predisposition to disease (nervous, circulatory, or immune) and exacerbate it. Hence, the variety (and differing severity) of vaccine damages. IT was a way of disguising what it was designed to do- and they blamed 'co-morbidities'!

Expand full comment
pobrecollie's avatar

There is no way that it is so sophisticated. What tangible things has genetic engineering actually brought us to date? Very little.

Expand full comment
Philippa Rees's avatar

You may be right, ( and perhaps you mistook my initial questions as accepting of the claims- they weren't ( more like incredulous) BUT there have been decades of malevolent attempts to alter the genome ( MK Ultra?) and genetically modified crops are prolific ( allegedly disease resistant) and there have been fairly widespread, anecdotal claims that the vaccines have altered personalities, almost beyond recognition- making people un-empathetic, and immune to emotional appeals. I think the malevolent use of DNA has been in existence for a long time.

Expand full comment
pobrecollie's avatar

Have a read of this article (actually the whole site is worth reading, there aren't many articles on it yet).

I studied this stuff years ago, with a degree in molecular biology and there was plenty of theory, skipping over the lack of actual evidence for many of the baseline assumptions.

https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2025/04/25/genetically-modified-organisms-are-not-precise-genetic-modifications-but-rather/

Jamie Andrews Virology Control studies is another one worth looking at.

I am beginning to think the entire field is fraud.

Expand full comment
Philippa Rees's avatar

Thank you for that link. A very interesting article. Gut-wise, I would be more inclined to trust the fully trustworthy- the predominance of greed, and patenting fraud than ANY claims of innovation! I am/was also a biologist and made a particular study of DNA. Saw it rather differently than others, as being plastic ( in the ways now claimed for epigenetics), and 50 years ago I wrote a theory about that plasticity, called Involution: now rewritten as An Odyssey Reconciling Science to God. It is a poetic history of science, as the recovery of memory-you may find it diverting. But I am glad to have been introduced to another whole field of doubt! Very few areas of belief are left standing! One has certainly replaced them, academia is utterly corrupt.

Expand full comment
Flowie Georgiou's avatar

file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/84/04/73515A7F-E5A9-4E2E-A2EF-21AF2DDE441E/IMG_3651.jpeg

anyone know what this UN organisation is doing getting its tentacles into the NHS?

Expand full comment
Ben Rubin's avatar

link doesn't work, can you share the image?

Expand full comment
Flowie Georgiou's avatar

i sent it to your mobile phone too

Expand full comment
Melanie Howd's avatar

More dangerous fiction!

Expand full comment
Ben Rubin's avatar

Which part of it?

Expand full comment
Melanie Howd's avatar

Being that the Climate Change narrative is hog wash and the plandemic too I don't believe what they're saying they can do with genes. That's not to say they won't be busy cooking 🤭

Expand full comment
pobrecollie's avatar

DNA is probably all fake and ghey anyway.

https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/

I would say that it's nothing to worry about based on that, but if they go ahead an use it anyway, it might be even worse.

Expand full comment