The NHS announces plans to harvest genetic data from every baby born in the United Kingdom. This is not healthcare, it's a biotechnological industry which runs on human DNA.
So! They have never isolated the Cov19 virus BUT they have sequenced a software genome model from it? That software was behind the 'we-got-it-right vaccine? The vast array of serious, sometimes lethal, side effects of the vaccines could have been, and were, predicted?(Otherwise, this monitoring baby DNA to 'prevent' disease programme is baloney). I have a hypothesis. I suspect that the mRNA vaccine was programmed to detect and target any predisposition to disease (nervous, circulatory, or immune) and exacerbate it. Hence, the variety (and differing severity) of vaccine damages. IT was a way of disguising what it was designed to do- and they blamed 'co-morbidities'!
You may be right, ( and perhaps you mistook my initial questions as accepting of the claims- they weren't ( more like incredulous) BUT there have been decades of malevolent attempts to alter the genome ( MK Ultra?) and genetically modified crops are prolific ( allegedly disease resistant) and there have been fairly widespread, anecdotal claims that the vaccines have altered personalities, almost beyond recognition- making people un-empathetic, and immune to emotional appeals. I think the malevolent use of DNA has been in existence for a long time.
Have a read of this article (actually the whole site is worth reading, there aren't many articles on it yet).
I studied this stuff years ago, with a degree in molecular biology and there was plenty of theory, skipping over the lack of actual evidence for many of the baseline assumptions.
Thank you for that link. A very interesting article. Gut-wise, I would be more inclined to trust the fully trustworthy- the predominance of greed, and patenting fraud than ANY claims of innovation! I am/was also a biologist and made a particular study of DNA. Saw it rather differently than others, as being plastic ( in the ways now claimed for epigenetics), and 50 years ago I wrote a theory about that plasticity, called Involution: now rewritten as An Odyssey Reconciling Science to God. It is a poetic history of science, as the recovery of memory-you may find it diverting. But I am glad to have been introduced to another whole field of doubt! Very few areas of belief are left standing! One has certainly replaced them, academia is utterly corrupt.
Being that the Climate Change narrative is hog wash and the plandemic too I don't believe what they're saying they can do with genes. That's not to say they won't be busy cooking 🤭
i remember Matt Hancock announcing we were going to do this within 8 years at the 2019 WEF davos event.
spine chilling but gullible parents will fall for it…..
People trust the NHS, it’s a cult
So! They have never isolated the Cov19 virus BUT they have sequenced a software genome model from it? That software was behind the 'we-got-it-right vaccine? The vast array of serious, sometimes lethal, side effects of the vaccines could have been, and were, predicted?(Otherwise, this monitoring baby DNA to 'prevent' disease programme is baloney). I have a hypothesis. I suspect that the mRNA vaccine was programmed to detect and target any predisposition to disease (nervous, circulatory, or immune) and exacerbate it. Hence, the variety (and differing severity) of vaccine damages. IT was a way of disguising what it was designed to do- and they blamed 'co-morbidities'!
There is no way that it is so sophisticated. What tangible things has genetic engineering actually brought us to date? Very little.
You may be right, ( and perhaps you mistook my initial questions as accepting of the claims- they weren't ( more like incredulous) BUT there have been decades of malevolent attempts to alter the genome ( MK Ultra?) and genetically modified crops are prolific ( allegedly disease resistant) and there have been fairly widespread, anecdotal claims that the vaccines have altered personalities, almost beyond recognition- making people un-empathetic, and immune to emotional appeals. I think the malevolent use of DNA has been in existence for a long time.
Have a read of this article (actually the whole site is worth reading, there aren't many articles on it yet).
I studied this stuff years ago, with a degree in molecular biology and there was plenty of theory, skipping over the lack of actual evidence for many of the baseline assumptions.
https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2025/04/25/genetically-modified-organisms-are-not-precise-genetic-modifications-but-rather/
Jamie Andrews Virology Control studies is another one worth looking at.
I am beginning to think the entire field is fraud.
Thank you for that link. A very interesting article. Gut-wise, I would be more inclined to trust the fully trustworthy- the predominance of greed, and patenting fraud than ANY claims of innovation! I am/was also a biologist and made a particular study of DNA. Saw it rather differently than others, as being plastic ( in the ways now claimed for epigenetics), and 50 years ago I wrote a theory about that plasticity, called Involution: now rewritten as An Odyssey Reconciling Science to God. It is a poetic history of science, as the recovery of memory-you may find it diverting. But I am glad to have been introduced to another whole field of doubt! Very few areas of belief are left standing! One has certainly replaced them, academia is utterly corrupt.
file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/84/04/73515A7F-E5A9-4E2E-A2EF-21AF2DDE441E/IMG_3651.jpeg
anyone know what this UN organisation is doing getting its tentacles into the NHS?
link doesn't work, can you share the image?
i sent it to your mobile phone too
More dangerous fiction!
Which part of it?
Being that the Climate Change narrative is hog wash and the plandemic too I don't believe what they're saying they can do with genes. That's not to say they won't be busy cooking 🤭
DNA is probably all fake and ghey anyway.
https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/
I would say that it's nothing to worry about based on that, but if they go ahead an use it anyway, it might be even worse.